Filed: Nov. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-10618 Document: 00512048444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2012 No. 11-10618 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE AVEJA, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-232-2 Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fed
Summary: Case: 11-10618 Document: 00512048444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2012 No. 11-10618 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE AVEJA, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-232-2 Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fede..
More
Case: 11-10618 Document: 00512048444 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 8, 2012
No. 11-10618
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE AVEJA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:10-CR-232-2
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Aveja has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Aveja has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.