Filed: Dec. 01, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30647 Summary Calendar _ Israel Bryan Harris; Angela Marie Harris; and Athena Maria Harris, for and on behalf of her minor child, Crystal Lynn Harris, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus United States Air Force and United States Department of the Navy, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (94-CV-3965) _ December 21, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-30647 Summary Calendar _ Israel Bryan Harris; Angela Marie Harris; and Athena Maria Harris, for and on behalf of her minor child, Crystal Lynn Harris, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus United States Air Force and United States Department of the Navy, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (94-CV-3965) _ December 21, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. Pe..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-30647
Summary Calendar
__________________
Israel Bryan Harris; Angela Marie Harris; and Athena Maria
Harris, for and on behalf of her minor child, Crystal Lynn Harris,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
United States Air Force and United States Department of the
Navy,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana
(94-CV-3965)
______________________________________________
December 21, 1995
Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
This is an appeal from the district court's order dismissing
plaintiffs-appellants' Federal Tort Claims Act suit for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that
have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published.
that the district court correctly found that the Feres doctrine
barred appellants' claim. The judgment of the district court is
affirmed for the reasons carefully and correctly set out in its
order granting the defendants-appellees' motion to dismiss. See
also Schoemer v. United States,
59 F.3d 26 (5th Cir. 1995), cert.
denied,
1995 WL 588294 (U.S. Nov. 27, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
2