Filed: Nov. 30, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50680 USDC No. W-94-CV-176 _ LEON ANTHONY BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD L. ADAMS ET AL., Defendants, RICHARD L. ADAMS, CO III Officer; JAMES AMENT, Officer, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - December 14, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leon Anthony Benjamin requests leave
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-50680 USDC No. W-94-CV-176 _ LEON ANTHONY BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD L. ADAMS ET AL., Defendants, RICHARD L. ADAMS, CO III Officer; JAMES AMENT, Officer, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - December 14, 1995 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Leon Anthony Benjamin requests leave ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-50680
USDC No. W-94-CV-176
__________________
LEON ANTHONY BENJAMIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD L. ADAMS ET AL.,
Defendants,
RICHARD L. ADAMS, CO III Officer;
JAMES AMENT, Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
- - - - - - - - - -
December 14, 1995
Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Leon Anthony Benjamin requests leave to proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court's dismissal
under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(d) of this civil rights action alleging
retaliation by prison officials and the denial of due process
regarding prison classification and disciplinary hearings.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
No. 95-50680
-2-
This appeal presents no issue of arguable merit and is thus
frivolous. Therefore, IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is
frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Benjamin previously has been warned by this court that he
may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings.
Accordingly, Benjamin is barred from filing any pro se, in forma
pauperis, civil appeals in this court or any pro se, in forma
pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to
this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission
of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this
court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this
circuit are directed to return to Benjamin, unfiled, any
attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.