Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Doe v. Ferrell, 95-60338 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-60338 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 21, 1995
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-60338 Summary Calendar _ JANE DOE I, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WILLIAM T. FERRELL, JR., Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:94-CV-85 _ December 15, 1995 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. She argues that there
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                         __________________

                            No. 95-60338
                          Summary Calendar
                         __________________

JANE DOE I,

                                                Plaintiff-Appellant,
                               versus

WILLIAM T. FERRELL, JR.,

                                              Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________

      Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                 Southern District of Mississippi
                        USDC No. 5:94-CV-85
_________________________________________________________________
                         December 15, 1995
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

the defendant's motion for summary judgment. She argues that there

remained genuine issues of material fact concerning her claims

against the defendant under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and under Mississippi

tort law.     We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error.   Accordingly, we AFFIRM for

essentially the reasons given by the district court.         Doe v.

Ferrell, No. 5:94-CV-85 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 1995).

                                                    A F F I R M E D.

     *
     Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that
have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on
the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."
Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer