Filed: Jan. 22, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10855 Summary Calendar _ DAVID Q. ATALIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus J. WELLS; ROBERTS, Lt.; MURPHY, Lt.; RUDY CHILDRESS; JUAN SOTO; ALLEN BOOTH; HAROLD KILLYON; CHARLES TURNBO; JOHN L. MEGATHLIN, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-278-Y - - - - - - - - - - January 4, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10855 Summary Calendar _ DAVID Q. ATALIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus J. WELLS; ROBERTS, Lt.; MURPHY, Lt.; RUDY CHILDRESS; JUAN SOTO; ALLEN BOOTH; HAROLD KILLYON; CHARLES TURNBO; JOHN L. MEGATHLIN, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-278-Y - - - - - - - - - - January 4, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10855
Summary Calendar
__________________
DAVID Q. ATALIG,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
J. WELLS; ROBERTS, Lt.; MURPHY, Lt.;
RUDY CHILDRESS; JUAN SOTO; ALLEN BOOTH;
HAROLD KILLYON; CHARLES TURNBO; JOHN L.
MEGATHLIN,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CV-278-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
January 4, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
David Q. Atalig appeals the dismissal, with prejudice, for
frivolousness of his Bivens** complaint. We have reviewed
Atalig's arguments and the record. We conclude that no
reversible error occurred. For essentially the same reasons as
explained in the district court's order of dismissal, see Atalig
v. Wells, No. 4:95-CV-278-Y (N.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 1995), we
AFFIRM.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
**
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
No. 95-10855
-2-