United States v. Canales, 95-20076 (1996)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 95-20076
Visitors: 44
Filed: Jan. 29, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20076 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MODESTO CANALES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-0074-01 - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE', and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Modesto Canales argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his convi
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-20076 Summary Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MODESTO CANALES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-0074-01 - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE', and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Modesto Canales argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his convic..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-20076 Summary Calendar __________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MODESTO CANALES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-0074-01 - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE', and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Modesto Canales argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions for making false statements on his income tax returns for the years 1987-89; that the district court erred by refusing to require the Government to produce the handwritten interview notes of an Internal Revenue Service Agent; and that the district court erroneously increased his Sentencing Guidelines offense level for obstruction of justice and the use * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-20076 -2- of his specialized accounting skills in the commission of the offense. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we discern no reversible error. AFFIRMED.
Source: CourtListener
