Filed: Feb. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40737 Summary Calendar _ Imad Farah Bechara, Petitioner-Appellant, versus Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (L-95-CV-79) _ February 1, 1996 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Imad Farah Bechara appeals from the district court's dismissal, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his petition for wr
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40737 Summary Calendar _ Imad Farah Bechara, Petitioner-Appellant, versus Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (L-95-CV-79) _ February 1, 1996 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Imad Farah Bechara appeals from the district court's dismissal, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his petition for wri..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40737
Summary Calendar
__________________
Imad Farah Bechara,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
Immigration and Naturalization Service,
Respondent-Appellee.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas
(L-95-CV-79)
______________________________________________
February 1, 1996
Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Imad Farah Bechara appeals from the district court's
dismissal, as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his petition
for writ of habeas corpus. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find, for the reasons set forth in its
Memorandum and Order dated August 24, 1995, that the district court
correctly dismissed Bechara's petition. Additionally, those issues
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
raised by Bechara for the first time on appeal are not properly
before this Court and will not be considered.
Bechara's request for a discretionary stay of deportation
under the All Writs Act is DENIED. Bechara's requests to
supplement the record on appeal are DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
2