Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40934 Document: 00512278257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-40934 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR MENDEZ, also known as Oscar Alberto Rivera-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-281-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GR
Summary: Case: 12-40934 Document: 00512278257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-40934 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR MENDEZ, also known as Oscar Alberto Rivera-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-281-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRA..
More
Case: 12-40934 Document: 00512278257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 18, 2013
No. 12-40934
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
OSCAR MENDEZ, also known as Oscar Alberto Rivera-Mendez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:12-CR-281-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Pubic Defender appointed to represent Oscar Mendez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Mendez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.