Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Oscar Mendez, 12-40934 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-40934 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40934 Document: 00512278257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-40934 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR MENDEZ, also known as Oscar Alberto Rivera-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-281-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GR
More
     Case: 12-40934       Document: 00512278257         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 18, 2013
                                     No. 12-40934
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR MENDEZ, also known as Oscar Alberto Rivera-Mendez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:12-CR-281-1


Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Pubic Defender appointed to represent Oscar Mendez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th
Cir. 2011). Mendez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer