Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41204 Document: 00512277254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-41204 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR MARIO BERNAL-ELIZONDO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-791-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: Case: 12-41204 Document: 00512277254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-41204 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR MARIO BERNAL-ELIZONDO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-791-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
Case: 12-41204 Document: 00512277254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 18, 2013
No. 12-41204
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
OSCAR MARIO BERNAL-ELIZONDO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-791-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Oscar Mario Bernal-Elizondo
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant’s
motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.