Case: 12-10344       Document: 00512277288         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 18, 2013
                                     No. 12-10344
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCUS CHOICE WILLIAMS, also known as Cross Country Redd, also known
as Redd, also known as Marcus Choice,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:09-CR-145-1


Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Choice Williams has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 

 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

 (5th
Cir. 2011). Williams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-10344   Document: 00512277288   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/18/2013

                              No. 12-10344

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2