Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41025 Document: 00512277770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-41025 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CURTIS DUANE BUTCHER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-140-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T
Summary: Case: 12-41025 Document: 00512277770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-41025 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CURTIS DUANE BUTCHER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CR-140-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Th..
More
Case: 12-41025 Document: 00512277770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 18, 2013
No. 12-41025
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CURTIS DUANE BUTCHER,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:11-CR-140-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Curtis Duane Butcher has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Butcher has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.