Case: 12-41170       Document: 00512278539         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/18/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           June 18, 2013
                                     No. 12-41170
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARCADIO GARCIA-CARDOZA, also known as Rene Garcia-Ramirez,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:12-CR-904-1


Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arcadio Garcia-
Cardoza (Garcia) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 

 (1967), and United States v.
Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein,
as well as Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.                    Accordingly,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-41170   Document: 00512278539   Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/18/2013

                              No. 12-41170

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.




                                    2