Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-11095 (Summary Calendar) _ JACKIE COWART, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CITY OF, A Texas Incorporated Municipality, ET AL., Defendants, DICK FUNK, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, In his representative capacity only, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:94-CV-068-C) - - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before GA
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-11095 (Summary Calendar) _ JACKIE COWART, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CITY OF, A Texas Incorporated Municipality, ET AL., Defendants, DICK FUNK, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, In his representative capacity only, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:94-CV-068-C) - - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before GAR..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-11095
(Summary Calendar)
__________________
JACKIE COWART,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CITY OF, A Texas
Incorporated Municipality, ET AL.,
Defendants,
DICK FUNK, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, In
his representative capacity only, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellants.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(USDC No. 6:94-CV-068-C)
- - - - - - - - - -
May 16, 1996
Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The defendants never presented a legally relevant claim of
qualified immunity to the district court or offered summary-
judgment evidence responsive to the plaintiff's factual allegations
supporting his claims of individual liability. This court lacks
appellate jurisdiction. Mitchell v. Forsyth,
472 U.S. 511, 531
(1985); 28 U.S.C. ยง 1291.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.