Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mammah, 95-20649 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 95-20649 Visitors: 39
Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20649 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus, CYPRIAN NMI MAMMAH, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CR-226-1 - - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Cyprian Mammah appeals his convictions for making false statements and bank fraud. 18 U.S.C.
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 95-20649
                            Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus,

CYPRIAN NMI MAMMAH,
                                              Defendant-Appellant.


                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-94-CR-226-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                              May 16, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Cyprian    Mammah   appeals   his   convictions   for   making   false

statements and bank fraud.     18 U.S.C. §§ 1014, 1344.       He contends

that the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence

under FED. R. EVID. 404(b).        We find no reversible error.         See

United States v. Beechum, 
582 F.2d 898
, 914 (5th Cir. 1978) (en

banc), cert. denied, 
440 U.S. 920
(1979).

     AFFIRMED




     *
        Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer