Filed: May 31, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40900 Summary Calendar _ MYRON C. DAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF DENISON, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees, JOHN DOES 1-15; JANE DOES, 1-5, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-55 - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Myron C. Dagley challenges the grant of summa
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-40900 Summary Calendar _ MYRON C. DAGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF DENISON, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees, JOHN DOES 1-15; JANE DOES, 1-5, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-55 - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Myron C. Dagley challenges the grant of summar..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40900
Summary Calendar
__________________
MYRON C. DAGLEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF DENISON, TEXAS, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees,
JOHN DOES 1-15; JANE DOES, 1-5,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CV-55
- - - - - - - - - -
May 17, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Myron C. Dagley challenges the grant of summary judgment for
the defendants-appellees. He does not challenge the district
court's imposition of sanction. Therefore, that issue is deemed
abandoned on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler,
14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th
Cir. 1994).
We have carefully reviewed the appellate arguments and the
record. For essentially the same reasons upon which the district
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-40900
-2-
court relied, see Dagley v. Lovell, No. 4:95cv55 (E.D. Tex. Oct.
13, 1995), we conclude that the district court did not err in
granting summary judgment for the defendants-appellees.
Dagley's argument concerning alleged judicial bias against
him by the district court is without merit. See Liteky v. United
States,
114 S. Ct. 1147, 1157-58 (1994).
Dagley's appeal is without arguable merit and thus
frivolous. Because it is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2.
DISMISSED.