Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10813 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JACK BANNISTER PARKS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-37-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jack Bannister Parks has filed a brief as
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10813 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JACK BANNISTER PARKS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-37-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Jack Bannister Parks has filed a brief as r..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10813
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JACK BANNISTER PARKS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CR-37-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
June 26, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Jack Bannister Parks has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found
no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
