Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-11016 Conference Calendar _ BOBBY JOE LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CV-2465-D - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bobby Joe Lee, Texas inmate #620339, challenges the district court's gran
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-11016 Conference Calendar _ BOBBY JOE LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CV-2465-D - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bobby Joe Lee, Texas inmate #620339, challenges the district court's grant..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-11016
Conference Calendar
__________________
BOBBY JOE LEE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:93-CV-2465-D
- - - - - - - - - -
June 25, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bobby Joe Lee, Texas inmate #620339, challenges the district
court's grant of summary judgement for the defendants by arguing
that he was entitled to more notice of the need for a response to
the defendants' motion for summary judgment.** We have carefully
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
**
Lee does not challenge the grant of summary judgment on
the substantive merits of the summary-judgment evidence to his
civil rights claim. This issue is deemed abandoned on appeal.
See Eason v. Thaler,
14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994).
No. 95-11016
-2-
reviewed the record and the arguments. We detect no procedural
error. See Martin v. Harrison County Jail,
975 F.2d 192, 193
(5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.