Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-11225 Conference Calendar ROBERT WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GLENN A. KLANDER; ROBERT WHITE; RONALD J. DONALDSON; WAYNE SCOTT; KAREN O. JONES; MICHAEL E. PHILLIPS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:95-CV-275 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert W
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-11225 Conference Calendar ROBERT WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GLENN A. KLANDER; ROBERT WHITE; RONALD J. DONALDSON; WAYNE SCOTT; KAREN O. JONES; MICHAEL E. PHILLIPS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:95-CV-275 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert Wi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-11225
Conference Calendar
ROBERT WILLIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GLENN A. KLANDER; ROBERT WHITE;
RONALD J. DONALDSON; WAYNE SCOTT;
KAREN O. JONES; MICHAEL E. PHILLIPS,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:95-CV-275
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert Willis, Texas prisoner #646806, appeals the dismissal
of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Willis
contends that the defendants violated his First Amendment right
of religion, his right of equal protection, and his right to be
free of cruel and unusual punishment when they did not prevent
certain vegetables from being included on his food tray. We have
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-11225
- 2 -
reviewed the record and Willis’ brief and find no reversible
error in the reasoning adopted by the district court. Willis v.
Klander, No. 2:95-CV-275 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 1995). Further, we
find that Willis’ appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we
DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
We caution Willis that any additional frivolous appeals
filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, Willis is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.