Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20277 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LY TRINH HINH, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-273-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ly Trinh Hinh appeals his sentence, contending that he should have received a reducti
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-20277 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LY TRINH HINH, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-273-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ly Trinh Hinh appeals his sentence, contending that he should have received a reductio..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20277
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LY TRINH HINH,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CR-H-94-273-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 26, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ly Trinh Hinh appeals his sentence, contending that he
should have received a reduction in his offense level for
acceptance of responsibility and that his offense level should
not have been increased for his role in the offense, for
obstruction of justice, and for requiring more than minimal
planning. Hinh executed a plea agreement containing a valid
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-20277
- 2 -
waiver of the right to appeal his sentence, and Hinh’s sentence
was determined in accordance with the plea agreement.
Accordingly, Hinh’s appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See United
States v. Portillo,
18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
115 S. Ct. 244 (1994); see 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.