Filed: Jul. 08, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30041 Conference Calendar BEULAH L. BASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus POLICE JURY OF FRANKLIN PARISH, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-1459 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Beulah Baskin appeals the dismissal of her suit pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30041 Conference Calendar BEULAH L. BASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus POLICE JURY OF FRANKLIN PARISH, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-1459 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Beulah Baskin appeals the dismissal of her suit pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 1..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30041
Conference Calendar
BEULAH L. BASKIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
POLICE JURY OF FRANKLIN PARISH,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CV-1459
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Beulah Baskin appeals the dismissal of her suit pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Baskin contends that her action was
not prescribed because the defendant’s alleged transgressions
constituted a continuing violation. We have reviewed the record
and briefs and conclude that the district court’s dismissal was
proper for essentially the same reasons adopted by that court.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-30041
- 2 -
Baskin v. Franklin Police Jury, No. CV95-1495-M (W.D. La. Dec.
13, 1995).
Baskin’s appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Howard v.
King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
We caution appellant that any additional frivolous appeals filed
by her will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, appellant is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.