Filed: Jul. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 11a0487n.06 FILED Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047 Jul 15, 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS LEONARD GREEN, Clerk FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ANTONIO GOINS; WILLIAM FREEMAN, ) ) Defendants-Appellants. ) ) BEFORE: BOGGS, ROGERS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. These consolidated cases addressed whe
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 11a0487n.06 FILED Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047 Jul 15, 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS LEONARD GREEN, Clerk FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ANTONIO GOINS; WILLIAM FREEMAN, ) ) Defendants-Appellants. ) ) BEFORE: BOGGS, ROGERS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. These consolidated cases addressed whet..
More
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 11a0487n.06
FILED
Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047
Jul 15, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE
) UNITED STATES DISTRICT
v. ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN
) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
ANTONIO GOINS; WILLIAM FREEMAN, )
)
Defendants-Appellants. )
)
BEFORE: BOGGS, ROGERS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. These consolidated cases addressed whether defendants who were
sentenced pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreements could qualify for sentence reductions based
on retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. Both Goins and Freeman were charged
with drug and weapon offenses in 2005 and each entered a plea agreement pursuant to Rule
11(c)(1)(C). The district court accepted the pleas and entered judgment. Subsequently, the
Sentencing Commission amended the Guidelines to reduce the disparity in the treatment of crack
and powder cocaine and made the amendment retroactive. See U.S.S.G. Appx. C, Amend. 706,
id.
§ 1B1.10. Goins and Freeman sought to have their sentences reduced, but the district court held that
this circuit’s precedent in United States v. Peveler,
359 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2004), precluded
modification of a sentence imposed pursuant to a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. This court
affirmed. United States v. Goins, 355 F. App’x 1 (6th Cir. 2009). The Supreme Court subsequently
Nos. 08-6374, 09-5047
United States v. Goins
granted certiorari and issued an opinion in Freeman’s case, reversing this court’s decision and
remanding the case. Freeman v. United States, No. 09-10245, 564 U.S. — (June 23, 2011). In light
of that decision, the Court issued a summary order granting certiorari and remanding Goins’s case.
Goins v. United States, No.09-10246, 564 U.S. — (June 28, 2011). We now remand both cases to
the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
-2-