Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. United States, 11022_1 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11022_1 Visitors: 66
Filed: Feb. 17, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 180 F.2d 851 SMITH v. UNITED STATES. No. 11022. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. February 17, 1950. Gunther Jacobson, New York City, for appellant. Edward T. Kane, Detroit, Mich., and Janet E. Kinnane, Bay City, Mich., for the United States. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of the District Judge in den
More

180 F.2d 851

SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 11022.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 17, 1950.

Gunther Jacobson, New York City, for appellant.

Edward T. Kane, Detroit, Mich., and Janet E. Kinnane, Bay City, Mich., for the United States.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of the District Judge in denying appellant's motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer