Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lambert Brothers, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company, Limited, Royal Insurance Company, Limited v. Evelyn P. Hines, 11316_1 (1951)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11316_1 Visitors: 38
Filed: Jul. 25, 1951
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 190 F.2d 352 LAMBERT BROTHERS, Inc., Appellant, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellee. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellant, v. Evelyn P. HINES et al., Appellees. Nos. 11316, 11315. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. July 25, 1951. Corn & Bell, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellant Lambert Bros. Curry & Harris, Chattanooga, Tenn., Maxwell A. Hines, Tifton, Ga., Hardwick Stuart, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellees. Kefauver, Duggan & Miller, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant Royal
More

190 F.2d 352

LAMBERT BROTHERS, Inc., Appellant,
v.
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellee.
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, Appellant,
v.
Evelyn P. HINES et al., Appellees.

Nos. 11316, 11315.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

July 25, 1951.

Corn & Bell, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellant Lambert Bros.

Curry & Harris, Chattanooga, Tenn., Maxwell A. Hines, Tifton, Ga., Hardwick Stuart, Cleveland, Tenn., for appellees.

Kefauver, Duggan & Miller, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant Royal Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

1

It appearing that the two appellants have moved to dismiss their appeals: Lambert Brothers, Inc., moving to dismiss its appeal against the Royal Insurance Company, Ltd. and the Royal Insurance Company, Ltd. moving to dismiss its appeal against Evelyn P. Hines, et al.; it is ordered by the Court that these case be, and same hereby are, dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer