Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

B. E. Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 13565 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 13565 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 08, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 262 F.2d 591 59-1 USTC P 9223 B. E. MILLS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 13565. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Jan. 8, 1959. Dewey R. Roark, Jr., and Scott P. Crampton, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Grant W. Wiprud, charles K. Rice, Arch M. Cantrall, Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Carter Bledsoe, Bethesda, Md., for respondent. Before MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and FREEMAN, District Judge. P
More

262 F.2d 591

59-1 USTC P 9223

B. E. MILLS, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13565.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1959.

Dewey R. Roark, Jr., and Scott P. Crampton, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Grant W. Wiprud, charles K. Rice, Arch M. Cantrall, Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Carter Bledsoe, Bethesda, Md., for respondent.

Before MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and FREEMAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case has been heard and considered on the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and on the record in the case;

2

And it appearing from the thirty-eight-page findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court of the United States that its decision is correct in the additions made to tax under section 293(b), Internal Revenue Code (1939), 26 U.S.C.A. 293(b);

3

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer