Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crane Co., a Corporation v. Crane Heating & Air Conditioning Co., a Corporation, Frank J. Crane, Jr., Thomas Crane, 15256 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 15256 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 04, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 324 F.2d 294 139 U.S.P.Q. 257 CRANE CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRANE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO., a corporation, Frank J. Crane, Jr., Thomas Crane, Defendants-Appellees. No. 15256. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Nov. 4, 1963. 1 Truman A. Herron, Cincinnati, Ohio, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellant. 2 William J. Rielly, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees. 3 Before WEICK and PHILLIPS, Circui
More

324 F.2d 294

139 U.S.P.Q. 257

CRANE CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CRANE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CO., a corporation, Frank
J. Crane, Jr., Thomas Crane, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15256.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1963.

1

Truman A. Herron, Cincinnati, Ohio, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellant.

2

William J. Rielly, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

3

Before WEICK and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and DARR, Senior District judge.

ORDER

4

The District Court, following the modification of its judgment by this Court in the previous appeal reported in 299 F.2d 577, entered an order upon the remand which provided:

5

'It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the modifications contained in the opinion and judgment entry of the Unied States Court of Appeals are hereby adopted and made a part of the original judgment entry in this case.'

6

The modification made by this Court in the previous appeal was to adopt and make a part of our order the agreement of the defendant set forth in Finding No. 9. The order entered by the District Court on remand as a above set forth clearly has the effect of adopting and making the defendant's agreement as set forth in Finding No. 9 a part of judgment which means that defendants is ordered to perform its provisions. This constituted a full compliance with our mandate which the District Court was without power to change. Stiller v. Squeez-A-Purse Corporation, 296 F.2d 504 (C.A.6).

7

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment entered by the District Court upon the remand be and it hereby is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer