Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ancil Adkins v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 15485_1 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 15485_1 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 17, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 330 F.2d 704 Ancil ADKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee. No. 15485. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 17, 1964. Harry C. Campbell, Pikeville, Ky., for appellant. George I. Cline, U.S. Atty., Arthur L. Brooks, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for appellee. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit judges. 1 ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT OF DISTRICT COURT. 2 Appellant filed a c
More

330 F.2d 704

Ancil ADKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and
Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15485.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 17, 1964.

Harry C. Campbell, Pikeville, Ky., for appellant.

George I. Cline, U.S. Atty., Arthur L. Brooks, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit judges.

1

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT OF DISTRICT COURT.

2

Appellant filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying appellant's claim for total and permanent disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The District Court sustained appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, and appellant has appealed to this Court.

3

The hearing examiner had denied appellant's application for benefits and his decision, when the Appeals Council overruled the request for review, became the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

4

Upon consideration, we are of the opinion that the findings of the Secretary are supported by substantial evidence and therefore are conclusive. 42 U.S.C. 405(g); Ward v. Ribicoff, 198 F. Supp. 15 (E.D.Tenn.), aff'd, 309 F.2d 157 (C.A.6).

5

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer