Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

86-1368 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-1368 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 19, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 815 F.2d 701 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Donald Chris BOLGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAGINAW, Saginaw County Sheriff Department, County of Saginaw, Michigan State Police, Jim Kelley, R.C. Coulson, Terry R. Manwell, Gwen Williams, H.A. Hauber
More

815 F.2d 701

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Donald Chris BOLGER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAGINAW, Saginaw County Sheriff Department, County
of Saginaw, Michigan State Police, Jim Kelley, R.C. Coulson,
Terry R. Manwell, Gwen Williams, H.A. Hauberstricken,
Richard R. Street, Barbara J. Kalbfleisch, Joseph G.
Defrancesco, John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1368.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 19, 1987.

Before ENGEL and GUY, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Plaintiff brought an action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against various individuals and entities in connection with an arrest and detention caused by a mistaken identification. The district court ultimately entered summary judgment for all defendants, and this appeal followed. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues.

3

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's judgment.

4

It is therefore ORDERED that the final order of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer