Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John William Lonchar v. Theodore Koehler, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and Frank J. Kelley, Michigan Attorney General, 87-1155 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-1155 Visitors: 50
Filed: Jul. 31, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 825 F.2d 411 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. John William LONCHAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodore KOEHLER, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and Frank J. Kelley, Michigan Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-1155 United States Court of App
More

825 F.2d 411

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
John William LONCHAR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Theodore KOEHLER, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and
Frank J. Kelley, Michigan Attorney General,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-1155

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 31, 1987.

ORDER

Before KENNEDY, JONES and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant's responses to this court's order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He states that there was a delay in receiving the district court's decision because it was mailed to the wrong institution and that he has no knowledge of Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel.

2

It appears from the record that the final order was entered December 3, 1986. The notice of appeal filed on January 14, 1987, was 12 days late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

3

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal. The time for filing a notice of appeal begins to run from the date of entry of the judgment, not its receipt. Pryor v. Marshall, 711 F.2d 63 (6th Cir. 1983).

4

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel be denied and the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer