Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert J. Kondrat v. Frank D. Celebrezze Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., 87-3012 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-3012 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 05, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 825 F.2d 411 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Robert J. KONDRAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank D. CELEBREZZE; Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-3012 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 5, 1987. ORDER Before ENGEL, ME
More

825 F.2d 411

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Robert J. KONDRAT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank D. CELEBREZZE; Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3012

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1987.

ORDER

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

1

The plaintiff appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights case. The appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Kondrat filed a complaint alleging that the defendants conspired to interfere with his state court proceedings. He never perfected service upon the defendants; he allowed the case to languish for nine months without any action.

3

The district court dismissed the case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed the case without prejudice.

4

The judgment of the district court is affirmed under Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, because the issues are not substantial and do not require oral argument.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer