Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Andre Floyd v. Arthur Tate, 87-3358 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-3358 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 01, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 841 F.2d 1126 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Andre FLOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur TATE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 87-3358. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 1, 1988. Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, CONTIE, Senior Cir
More

841 F.2d 1126

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Andre FLOYD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Arthur TATE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-3358.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 1, 1988.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Petitioner, Andre Floyd, has appealed from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the entire record and the briefs filed by the respective parties, this court AFFIRMS the decision of the district court for the reasons stated by Judge Bell in his order of February 27, 1987.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer