Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

George Bittner v. Judge R.N. Lewis, 87-5778 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-5778 Visitors: 49
Filed: Mar. 14, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 842 F.2d 330 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. George BITTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge R.N. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-5778. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 14, 1988. Before KEITH, BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and RYAN, Circuit J
More

842 F.2d 330

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
George BITTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Judge R.N. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-5778.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 14, 1988.

Before KEITH, BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This pro se plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

Naming a Campbell County District judge as defendant, the plaintiff asked that his driving under the influence conviction be set aside. He claimed that the defendant, who presided at his trial, denied him procedural due process and convicted him in violation of the fifth amendment prohibition against double jeopardy.

3

A United States magistrate recommended dismissal of the suit to which objections were never filed. Upon review, the district court subsequently dismissed the action without prejudice.

4

Upon review, we conclude that the plaintiff waived his right to seek appellate review because he did not file objections to the magistrate's report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985).

5

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment entered June 10, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer