Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mary E. Baugh, 88-6211 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 88-6211 Visitors: 29
Filed: May 23, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 875 F.2d 868 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary E. BAUGH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-6211. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 23, 1989. Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, and MERRITT and KRUPANS
More

875 F.2d 868

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mary E. BAUGH, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 88-6211.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 23, 1989.

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, and MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer