Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Janice Edmiston v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 89-1027 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 89-1027 Visitors: 53
Filed: Sep. 29, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 886 F.2d 330 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Janice EDMISTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-1027. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 29, 1989. Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges a
More

886 F.2d 330

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Janice EDMISTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-1027.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 29, 1989.

Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer