Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. American Sunroof Corporation Automobile Specialty Corporation American Sunroof Manufacturing Co., 80-1431 (1981)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 80-1431 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 23, 1981
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 667 F.2d 20 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2862 , 94 Lab.Cas. P 13,484 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN SUNROOF CORPORATION; Automobile Specialty Corporation; American Sunroof Manufacturing Co., Respondents. No. 80-1431. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 23, 1981. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph Schwachter, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Brian S. Ahearn, Stringari, Fritz, Kreger, Ahearn & Hunsinger, Detroit, Mich., for respondent
More

667 F.2d 20

109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2862, 94 Lab.Cas. P 13,484

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
AMERICAN SUNROOF CORPORATION; Automobile Specialty
Corporation; American Sunroof Manufacturing Co.,
Respondents.

No. 80-1431.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 23, 1981.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Joseph Schwachter, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Brian S. Ahearn, Stringari, Fritz, Kreger, Ahearn & Hunsinger, Detroit, Mich., for respondents.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Circuit Judge, ENGEL, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

On receipt and consideration of a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding that respondent violated § 8(a)(1) (1976) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (61 Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519, 88 Stat. 395, 29 U.S.C. § 151, et seq.) (1976); and

2

On review of the briefs and records filed in this proceeding and finding that there is substantial evidence to support the order entered by the National Labor Relations Board, except for the following sentence of the Board order, which is hereby deleted: "(d) Announcing, presenting, or distributing employee handbooks for salaried employees, for the purpose of dissuading employees from supporting or voting for the Union,"

3

Now, therefore, enforcement is granted to said order, with the exception noted above.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer