Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ronald W. Morgan, 92-2034 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 92-2034 Visitors: 219
Filed: Oct. 13, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 977 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald W. MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-2034. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 13, 1992. Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZ
More

977 F.2d 583

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald W. MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-2034.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1992.

Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

The defendant appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. That appeal is pending as Case No. 92-1456. Following his sentencing, the defendant moved the district court for release pending appeal. The district court denied that motion, and the defendant filed a notice of appeal resulting in the instant case. The defendant has filed a brief to which the government responds. Defendant has replied to the government's response.

2

Fed.R.App.P. 9(b) provides that upon the district court's denial of bail, the defendant may make a motion for release to the court of appeals if an appeal is pending. This rule suggests that release pending appeal is more properly resolved via a motion in the pending appeal rather than as the subject of a separate appeal. We therefore construe this appeal as a motion for release pending resolution of the direct appeal in 92-1456, but conclude that the defendant is not entitled to bail.

3

The Mandatory Detention Act of 1990 provides in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(2) that a person found guilty of an offense described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(A), (B), or (C) shall be detained. Section 3142(f)(1)(C) includes offenses for which a maximum term of ten years imprisonment or more is prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq. The defendant's offense falls within that category. The mandatory detention provision applies even though the defendant's ultimate sentence is less than ten years. See United States v. Carr, 947 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir.1991). Therefore, the defendant is not entitled to bail.

4

It is ORDERED that the district court's order denying bail pending appeal is affirmed, and the defendant's request for release is denied. This appeal is dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer