Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freddie Eason v. The City of Memphis, 92-6157 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 92-6157 Visitors: 41
Filed: Feb. 03, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 9 F.3d 482 Freddie EASON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-6157, 92-6158. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb. 3, 1994. 1 Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Ciruit Judges. ORDER 2 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provi
More

9 F.3d 482

Freddie EASON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF MEMPHIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 92-6157, 92-6158.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1994.

1

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Ciruit Judges.

ORDER

2

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

3

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

4

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

5

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer