Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Edmond Flowers, 93-5542 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 93-5542 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 08, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 14 F.3d 602 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edmond FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5542. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 8, 1993. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge and NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges. O
More

14 F.3d 602
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Edmond FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-5542.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1993.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge and NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer