Filed: Jun. 17, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 89 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Carolyn S. GRISHAM; William A. Grisham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART PROPERTIES, INC.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-5816. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 17, 1996. 1 Before: MILBURN and
Summary: 89 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Carolyn S. GRISHAM; William A. Grisham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART PROPERTIES, INC.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-5816. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 17, 1996. 1 Before: MILBURN and ..
More
89 F.3d 833
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Carolyn S. GRISHAM; William A. Grisham, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
WAL-MART PROPERTIES, INC.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-5816.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 17, 1996.
1
Before: MILBURN and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; ROSEN, District Judge.
ORDER
2
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
3
It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the district court.
