Filed: Jun. 05, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 89 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Michael RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Defendant, Matthew Amel; Michael Havela; Wayne W. Stine; William D. Nicholas; J. Stephens; Carl McMellan; Joseph Hosey; Terry Pitcher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-1392. Uni
Summary: 89 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Michael RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Defendant, Matthew Amel; Michael Havela; Wayne W. Stine; William D. Nicholas; J. Stephens; Carl McMellan; Joseph Hosey; Terry Pitcher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-1392. Unit..
More
89 F.3d 835
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Michael RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert BROWN, Jr., Defendant,
Matthew Amel; Michael Havela; Wayne W. Stine; William D.
Nicholas; J. Stephens; Carl McMellan; Joseph
Hosey; Terry Pitcher, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-1392.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 5, 1996.
1
Before: MERRITT and COLE, Circuit Judges; ECHOLS, District Judge.
ORDER
2
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
3
It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED for reasons as stated from the bench.
