Filed: Apr. 13, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 12, 2011 Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 09-2880 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 3:07-cr-30179 CARL A. COURTRIGHT, III, David R. Herndon, Defendant-Appellant. Chief Judge. O R D E R On consideration of the petition for panel rehear
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 12, 2011 Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 09-2880 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 3:07-cr-30179 CARL A. COURTRIGHT, III, David R. Herndon, Defendant-Appellant. Chief Judge. O R D E R On consideration of the petition for panel reheari..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 12, 2011 Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 09‐2880 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 3:07‐cr‐30179 CARL A. COURTRIGHT, III, David R. Herndon, Defendant‐Appellant. Chief Judge. O R D E R On consideration of the petition for panel rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by Petitioner‐Appellant on March 25, 2011, the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on January 13, 2010, is hereby AMENDED as follows: Page 4, line 2‐3, delete “desktop” and replace with “computer” Page 12, line 3, delete “large part” and replace with “portion” Page 12, line 4, delete “was found guilty by a jury of” and replace with “pled guilty to” No judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc and the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
