Judges: PerCuriam
Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 25, 2013 Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 03-1322 Appeal from the United States District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Court for the Northern District of Plaintiff-Appellee, Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 01 CR 543-3 SEDGWICK JOHNSON, James F. Ho
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 25, 2013 Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge No. 03-1322 Appeal from the United States District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Court for the Northern District of Plaintiff-Appellee, Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 01 CR 543-3 SEDGWICK JOHNSON, James F. Hol..
More
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 25, 2013
Before
RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 03‐1322
Appeal from the United States District
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Court for the Northern District of
Plaintiff‐Appellee, Illinois, Eastern Division.
v. No. 01 CR 543‐3
SEDGWICK JOHNSON, James F. Holderman,
Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
We issued a limited remand in this case to inquire whether the district court would
impose the same 360‐month sentence on Sedgwick Johnson if it knew the full extent of its
discretion. After considering both parties’ positions, the district court has responded that
it would reimpose the same sentence. Accordingly, there was no plain error in Johnson’s
sentence, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.