Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Johnson, Femi, 04-2406 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 04-2406 Visitors: 6
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 07, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 7, 2006 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge No. 04-2406 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 01 CR 103 FEMI JOHNSON. Defendant-Appellant. Matthew F. Kennelly, Ju
More
                             UNPUBLISHED ORDER
                          Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53



       United States Court of Appeals
                                For the Seventh Circuit
                                Chicago, Illinois 60604


                                     June 7, 2006

                                        Before

                          Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge

                          Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge

                          Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge

No. 04-2406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        Appeal from the United States District
     Plaintiff-Appellee,                         Court for the Northern District of
                                                 Illinois, Eastern Division.
      v.
                                                 No. 01 CR 103
FEMI JOHNSON.
     Defendant-Appellant.                        Matthew F. Kennelly, Judge.


                                      ORDER

    On Paladino remand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same
guidelines sentence that he imposed originally had he known that the guidelines were
merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in
this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the
defendant's arguments for a lower standard in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a).

                                                                  AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer