Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Nov. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 3, 2007 Decided November 6, 2007 Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 06-4263 CHASE MARCONI, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 05 C 3136 MICHA
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 3, 2007 Decided November 6, 2007 Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 06-4263 CHASE MARCONI, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 05 C 3136 MICHAE..
More
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 3, 2007 Decided November 6, 2007 Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 06-4263 CHASE MARCONI, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 05 C 3136 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant-Appellee. Michael T. Mason, Magistrate Judge. ORDER Chase Marconi applied for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”), alleging that he suffers from a mental impairment that became disabling before June 30, 2002, the date his disability insurance lapsed. The issue on appeal is whether the Social Security Administration applied the law correctly and relied on substantial evidence in concluding that Marconi was not disabled as of the date he was last insured. Because the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) correctly applied the law in finding that Marconi did not have a severe impairment and substantial evidence supports this finding, we affirm.
