Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lopez-Castro, 07-4266 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 07-4266 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 15, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 07-4266 (D.C. No. 1:07-CR-00014-DB-1) GILBERTO LOPEZ-CASTRO, (D. Utah) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before MURPHY, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement.
More
                                                                         FILED
                                                             United States Court of Appeals
                                                                     Tenth Circuit

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                  April 15, 2008
                                                                 Elisabeth A. Shumaker
                            FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                     Clerk of Court


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff-Appellee,

    v.                                                   No. 07-4266
                                               (D.C. No. 1:07-CR-00014-DB-1)
    GILBERTO LOPEZ-CASTRO,                                (D. Utah)

                Defendant-Appellant.


                            ORDER AND JUDGMENT *


Before MURPHY, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.



         This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the

appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed

pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 
359 F.3d 1315
(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc).

In response, defendant concedes that the government’s motion is well taken and

that the appeal should be dismissed.



*
      This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not
materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);
10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral
argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and
10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.


                                 ENTERED FOR THE COURT
                                 PER CURIAM




                                   -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer