Filed: Feb. 19, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 19, 2009 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 08-6056 v. (W.D. Oklahoma) GARY W. FLANDERS, (D.C. No. 5:03-cr-00243-F-1) Defendant - Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. Gary Flanders was convicted on two counts of misapplication of bank funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 656; two counts of scheming to defraud
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 19, 2009 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 08-6056 v. (W.D. Oklahoma) GARY W. FLANDERS, (D.C. No. 5:03-cr-00243-F-1) Defendant - Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. Gary Flanders was convicted on two counts of misapplication of bank funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 656; two counts of scheming to defraud ..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
February 19, 2009
TENTH CIRCUIT
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 08-6056
v. (W.D. Oklahoma)
GARY W. FLANDERS, (D.C. No. 5:03-cr-00243-F-1)
Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before HARTZ, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
Gary Flanders was convicted on two counts of misapplication of bank
funds, see 18 U.S.C. § 656; two counts of scheming to defraud a bank, see
id.
§ 1344(1); making a false entry in bank records, see
id. § 1005; and conspiracy to
make a false statement to a bank, see
id. § 371. His undisputed sentencing
guideline range was 51 to 63 months’ imprisonment. The district court varied
upward, imposing a 77 months’ sentence.
*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is
not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value
consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Mr. Flanders’ sole issue on appeal is that his sentence was substantively
unreasonable. We have reviewed his arguments and disagree.
The sentence imposed is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Harris L Hartz
Circuit Judge
-2-
08-6056 - United States v. Flanders
O’BRIEN, J. concurring.
In a series of ceremonial rites the leveling forces of the guidelines, their
hearthstone, were sacrificed on the altar of sentencing discretion and appellate
courts rendered impotent. See Spears v. United States,
129 S. Ct. 840 (2009);
Gall v. United States,
128 S. Ct. 586 (2007); Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S.
Ct. 558 (2007); United States v. Booker,
543 U.S. 220 (2005).