Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

89-3025 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 89-3025 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 09, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 931 F.2d 1215 Vincent DIMEO, James Kinnard, William Knott, James Curran, and Melvin Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Farrell J. GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Illinois Racing Board, David L. Diana, Ray H. Garrison, Thomas J. Garvey, Ralph Gonzalez, Irwin Jann, Hubert F. Meese, Cecil J. Troy and Dan K. Webb, in their official capacities as members of the Illinois Racing Board, Defendants-Appellants. No. 89-3025. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. May 9, 1991.
More

931 F.2d 1215

Vincent DIMEO, James Kinnard, William Knott, James Curran,
and Melvin Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Farrell J. GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as Chairman of
the Illinois Racing Board, David L. Diana, Ray H. Garrison,
Thomas J. Garvey, Ralph Gonzalez, Irwin Jann, Hubert F.
Meese, Cecil J. Troy and Dan K. Webb, in their official
capacities as members of the Illinois Racing Board,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 89-3025.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

May 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Milton I. Shadur, Judge.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed March 1, 1991 by counsel for the defendants-appellants in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active members of the court having been requested, and a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted to GRANT a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same are hereby, GRANTED.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment and opinion entered in this case on February 4, 1991, 924 F.2d 664, be, and are hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer