Filed: Apr. 16, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 729 F.2d 1026 Carl Edwin WIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan V. McKASKLE, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 80-2278. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 16, 1984. Craig Smyser, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant. Leslie A. Benitez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Fred Shannon, Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED S
Summary: 729 F.2d 1026 Carl Edwin WIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan V. McKASKLE, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 80-2278. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 16, 1984. Craig Smyser, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant. Leslie A. Benitez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Fred Shannon, Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED ST..
More
729 F.2d 1026
Carl Edwin WIGGINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dan V. McKASKLE, Acting Director, Texas Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 80-2278.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 16, 1984.
Craig Smyser, Houston, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
Leslie A. Benitez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Fred Shannon, Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before GARZA, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 104 S. Ct. 1620, 79 L.Ed.2d ----, has reversed the judgment of this Court, 681 F.2d 266, and remanded the cause to us for further procedures in conformity with its opinion.
2
Accordingly, it is now ordered that the judgment of the district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.
