Filed: Aug. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-3933 _ Sokhna Kane, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: August 13, 2010 Filed: August 25, 2010 _ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-3933 _ Sokhna Kane, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: August 13, 2010 Filed: August 25, 2010 _ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3933
___________
Sokhna Kane, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Board
* of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney *
General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: August 13, 2010
Filed: August 25, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of her
motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its
discretion. See Clifton v. Holder,
598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of
review); Tamenut v. Mukasey,
521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (en
banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales,
427 F.3d 1160,
1162 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hernandez-Moran v. Gonzales,
408
F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir. 2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review.
______________________________