Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader, 10-2628 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 10-2628 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2628 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Yamil Rivera-Kader, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Llamil Kader, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: October 28, 2010 Filed: October 29, 2010 _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to c
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 10-2628
                                   ___________

United States of America,            *
                                     *
           Appellee,                 * Appeal from the United States
                                     * District Court for the
      v.                             * District of Nebraska.
                                     *
Yamil Rivera-Kader, also known as    *       [UNPUBLISHED]
Llamil Kader,                        *
                                     *
           Appellant.                *
                                ___________

                             Submitted: October 28, 2010
                                Filed: October 29, 2010
                                 ___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s1 order denying his petition for
a writ of mandamus to compel the government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance.

     The district court did not abuse its discretion: among other reasons, Rivera-
Kader failed to establish that he had a clear and indisputable right to a Rule 35(b)


      1
       The HONORABLE LAURIE SMITH CAMP, United States District Judge for
the District of Nebraska.
motion because his plea agreement reserved to the government the discretion whether
to file such a motion. See In re MidAmerican Energy Co., 
286 F.3d 483
, 486 (8th Cir.
2002) (per curiam) (standard of review); In re SDDS, Inc., 
97 F.3d 1030
, 1034 (8th
Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer