United States Court of Appeals
                         FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                 ___________

                                 No. 10-1351
                                 ___________

Daniel Hemmah,                           *
                                         *
      Plaintiff - Appellant,             *
                                         *
v.                                       *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
City of Red Wing; Kay Kuhlmann,          * District Court for the
City Council Administrator for the       * District of Minnesota.
City of Red Wing, in her official and    *
individual capacities; Roger Seymour, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Employee Services Director for the       *
City of Red Wing, in his official and    *
individual capacities; Dennis Tebbe,     *
Public Works Director for the City of *
Red Wing, in his official and individual *
capacities,                              *
                                         *
      Defendants - Appellees.            *
                                    ___________

                           Submitted: November 18, 2010
                              Filed: January 6, 2011
                               ___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.
       Daniel James Hemmah sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and won damages at trial.
He rejected remittitur, and the district court1 granted a new trial. After the jury
awarded no damages, the court entered a nominal damages award and ordered
Hemmah to move for attorney’s fees by October 16, 2009. The parties consented to
an extension to October 23. Instead of filing a motion for fees, Hemmah filed an
untimely amended notice of appeal on October 21. This court dismissed the appeal,
and Hemmah filed his fee petition on January 17, 2010. The district court denied the
petition as untimely. Hemmah v. City of Red Wing, No. 06-3887, 

(D. Minn. Jan. 20, 2010). It later denied relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1).
Hemmah v. City of Red Wing, No. 06-3887, 

(D. Minn. Mar. 22,
2010).

       Hemmah claims that the district court lost jurisdiction once he appealed.
However, the district court retained jurisdiction as there was no final judgment on
attorney’s fees. Harmon v. United States ex rel. Farmers Home Admin., 

,
587 (8th Cir. 1996) (“[W]here the issue of attorney fees is not before the court of
appeals . . . the district court may consider it.”) (citations omitted). Hemmah also
argues that the district court abused its discretion by declining to find excusable
neglect under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1). The district court considered all the relevant
factors from In re Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability
Litigation, 

, 866-67 (8th Cir. 2007). It did not give significant weight to
irrelevant factors, and its conclusion does not reflect an improper weighing of the
relevant factors.

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

                                         -2-